Editors: This is a self syndicated
column. If you wish to publish this column in your newspaper, magazine, journal or
on your websites please click here:Syndicate
Muqtedar Khan is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Adrian College in
Michigan. He earned his Ph.D. in International Relations, Political Philosophy, and
Islamic Political Thought, from Georgetown University in May 2000.
Dr. Khan's column has
appeared in The Daily Telegram, San Francisco Chronicle, Detroit Free Press, Detroit
News, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, Muslim Democrat,
Iviews.com,ptimes.com, Theglobalist.com, Freerepublic.com, MiddleEast Online,
Beliefnet.com, Arabies Trends, Al-Mustaqbal, and many other periodicals world wide.
For a comprehensive resume click here: Resume
is an interesting puzzle. It is representative of the contemporary postmodern condition
when nothing is clear-cut. It is at once both highly developed as well as underdeveloped.
Bangladesh is a country that is economically backward and politically quite advanced. Many
political and social scientists have often equated democracy with development and
capitalism with political freedom. Bangladesh belies both these assumptions. It is a
reasonably free society while being one of the worlds poorest economies. Even the
Freedom House ratings, which are quite biased against non-Western societies in their
measurements, rate Bangladesh as a reasonably free state.
In July of this year, the present
government of the Awami League party with Sheikh Hasina Wajid as Prime Minister will
complete one full electoral cycle. For a nation that has existed for only 30 years this is
quite an achievement. In fact, if one were to compare the Bangladeshi democracy with
the American democracy at the age of thirty, the nation of Bengalis will come out quite
favorably. In 200 years, the US has yet to allow a woman to run the state.
Bangladesh has already had two
women heads of state and the present head of the government, Sheikh Hasina, and the leader
of the opposition party, Begum Zia, are both women. It is amazing that this country of a
hundred million Muslims looks like a matriarchical society, belying another myth that
associates patriarchy with Muslim culture. Bangladesh apparently is destined to destroy
widely held myths. First by its very origins it has exploded the myth of Islamic unity. By
breaking away from Pakistan, Bangladesh has shown that asabiyyah (Ibn Khalduns term
for ethnic solidarity) can at times overwhelm Islamic unity. Perhaps the rupture of the
united Pakistan is more a commentary on the lip service given to Islamic brotherhood by
Muslim leaders than the relative powers of Islam and ethnicity. Nonetheless, the very
existence of Bangladesh is a blow to the rhetoric of Islamic unity that most Muslims like
to crow about. The present day Muslims of Bangladesh live in greater harmony with its 11%
Hindu minority than they did with Muslims of non-Bengali origins.
Bangladesh is not the only case
where interests other than Islamic unity have proven more powerful. The quick
disintegration of the United Arab Republic, a union of Syria and Egypt that combined
Islam, asabiyyah (Arab nationalism) and external threat (from Israel), is another case of
Islamic entities splitting for interests other than Islam.
The second myth that Bangladesh
has exposed is the claim by some Muslims and many westerners that Islam and democracy are
incompatible. Bangladesh while not exactly an exemplary democracy or an advertisement for
Islamic governance has nevertheless succeeded in demonstrating that a community dominated
by Muslims can have Islam as the state religion and still provide democratic rights to its
citizens and freedom of religion to its minorities.
Yes, there are cases of religious
discrimination and harassment of minorities in Bangladesh. For example in 1992, when the
Babri Masjid was destroyed in India by Hindu nationalists nearly 80 Hindu temples were
desecrated in Bangladesh as an act of revenge. If what the Hindus did was a travesty, then
what the Bangladeshi Muslims did was 80 times worse. Also in April, unknown miscreants
blew a Roman Catholic Church. But these infrequent tragedies apart, Bangladesh is striving
to be a good state that treats all its citizens justly.
Its constitution at least is
determined to do justice to all. It recognizes the primacy of Islam (Article 2A) but
guarantees the freedom of religion of all communities (Article 41). Article 11 of the
constitution asserts that the Republic will be a democracy that respects all the human
rights and freedoms of all its citizens. Article 39 specifically protects the
freedom of speech and expression of every citizen (39a) and 39b guarantees the freedom of
Cynics, especially those who
neither understand nor respect democratic principles, maybe tempted to underestimate the
importance of their constitution. However, the key is their implementation. In the era of
globalization and global interdependence, having these rights enshrined in the
constitution is an important first step. International pressure, especially from
NGOs and human rights activists has a greater impact on states that already claim to
respect these rights. Often moving court in cases of human rights violations provides
effective remedy. But in states whose constitutions do not already enshrine human rights;
states can continue to violate their own citizens with impunity leaving no recourse to
domestic as well as international human rights activists.
As already discussed above
Bangladeshis have also shown that Muslim societies allow women more opportunities for
self-expression in the public arena than they are given credit for. Bangladeshi
women are not only well integrated into the political arena but are also quite active in
the economic sphere. The micro-enterprise project (Grameen Bank) initiated by Dr. Muhammad
Yunus has shown that empowering women is an important strategy to fight poverty and
underdevelopment. Bangladeshi women have shown that while remaining within the moral
sphere of Islamic values, women can play an important role in the economic well being of
their immediate families and the political well being of their nation.
Yes, indeed Bangladesh is a
highly developed state in political terms. But sadly it exposes an American myth that
prosperity follows freedom. Bangladesh is a poor democracy. Its per capita
income is less than $500 a year. 36% of the population is below poverty level and nearly
35% of the population is unemployed. Annually a large section of the country is submerged
in floods and as sea levels rise with global warming Bangladesh will face more drastic
environmental threats with devastating economic implications.
Lack of industrialization, poor
infrastructures, and untapped human resources will continue to challenge Bangladesh in its
quest for economic well being. Poverty and disasters will continue to test the moral and
political fiber of the nation. There are no shortcuts out of the environmental and
economic troubles of Bangladesh. But we must remember that in spite of all its
difficulties, Bangladeshis have found a way to live in freedom, respect each others
dignity and remain connected with God.
A Poor Muslim Democracy