|
||||||||||||||||
Editors: This is a self syndicated column. If you wish to publish this column in your newspaper, magazine, journal or on your websites please click here:Syndicate
|
The US constitution was framed with the
explicit purpose of strengthening the Federal government in order to protect among other
things the integrity of the Union. But in the debates that ensued before the ratification
of the new constitution, the anti-federalists pressed for the inclusion of the Bill of
Rights in order to protect individuals and states from the leviathan that would emerge
from the new constitution. But we all know the sacred history of the American constitution
-- the social contract par excellence -- and we do not need a Johnny come lately
like me to remind us of this. Or do we? Since Sept. 11th, the two
nations most affected by it, America and Afghanistan, have been rapidly hurtling in the
opposite direction on the highway of freedom. With
each passing day, with every victory for the US and its allies, Afghanistan is becoming
more and more of a free state. Some of the new legal measures taken to
preempt further attacks on America are unfortunately clipping away at the Bill of Rights.
Every new legal measure seems to raise a new civil rights concern. In the following
section I shall examine how the new measures affect the Bill of Rights. Amendment
IV
The
right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue,
but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the
place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. The new terrorism bill not only allows
law enforcement officers to secretly search homes and offices of people (with the
collusion of judges), it also permits federal agencies to hold people without charges for
seven days. These new provisions nullify each
and every safeguard in article four. Amendment
V
No person shall
. . be
deprived of life, liberty
without due process of law. The executive order that allows the
government to try and punish suspects using military style tribunals a legal term
for kangaroo courts -- and even execute them
using very low standards of evidence is an assault on an important clause of the fifth
amendment. Amendment
VI
In
all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial,
by an impartial jury
and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation;
to be confronted with the witnesses against him; The
terrorism act of 1996 had permitted the use of secret evidence to prosecute
and deport terrorists. The idea of secrecy was incorporated in that law to safeguard the
intelligence sources of the evidence, such as a mole in a terrorist cell. But in the few
cases it was used, almost all judges threw the cases out after perusing the evidence as
insufficient. FBI and INS were using the term secret, in secret evidence as a
substitute for evidence itself. The case of Mazen Najjar, a Palestinian from Florida who
was detained for three years from 1997-2000 and then set free when a judge ordered his
release after finding no evidence against him, adequately illustrates how this law could
and was abused. The secret evidence act that still remains in the law books and is being
used by the present administration violates many of the provisions of the sixth amendment. Amendment
IX
The
enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or
disparage others retained by the people. The
American constitution does not safeguard the rights of citizens alone. It also safeguards
the rights of all those who are subjects of US laws, i.e. those who reside within the
territorial borders of the US. The tendency of the new administration and the new
terrorism bill to differentiate between citizens and non-citizens with regards to civil
liberties is a gross violation of the ninth amendment, which in my opinion protects the
unenumerated rights of permanent residents and legal as well as illegal aliens. Perhaps my fears are exaggerated. But believe me there is no exaggeration here when I say that we are rapidly slipping down the scale of liberty and freedom. |
|||||||||||||||