Muqtedar Khan's Column on 
Global Affairs

  GlocalEye is Muqtedar Khan's Column on global affairs.  It seeks to understand the  simultaneous impact of globalization and localization.

Dr. Muqtedar Khan is the Chair of department of Political Science and the Director of International Studies at Adrian College. He earned his Ph.D. in International Relations, Political Philosophy, and Islamic Political Thought,  from Georgetown University in May 2000.

Flash: Muqtedar Khan is presently a Visiting Fellow at the Brookings Institution.  He is also the current President of the Association of Muslim Social Scientists (2003-2005) and a Fellow of the Institute for Social Policy and Understanding.

Dr. Khan's column has appeared in The Wall Street, Dawn International (Pakistan), Daily Times (Pakistan), Outlook India (India), The Muslim Gazette (India), Nagasaki Post (Japan), The Daily Telelegraph (London), Manila Times (Philippines), Jordan Times (Jordan), Aljazeera (Qatar), The Daily Telegram, San Francisco Chronicle, San Francisco Examiner, Detroit Free Press, Detroit News, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, Muslim Democrat, I,, Arabies Trends (France), Al-Mustaqbal (Lebanon), Lebanon Daily Star, and many other periodicals world wide.

For a comprehensive 
resume click here
: Resume

Recently Posted Articles




I am happy to announce the publication of my first book -- American Muslims: Bridging Faith and Freedom For more details about the book go to: Book


1. Islam in America
2. American Muslims and American Politics
3. American Muslims and American Foreign Policy
4. American Muslims and American Society
5. American Muslim 
6. Reflections on Islam and Democracy
7. The Attack on America ands its 
8. An American Muslim Perspective of the Muslim 


To Place an order with the publisher 
call Amana Publication:
or Click Here:

To place an order at
Click Here:
American Muslims:
Bridging Faith and Freedom







American Muslims: Bridging Faith and Freedom.


































For notification of new articles


Muqtedar Khan

This article was published in The Daily Star 08.16.03 and will be published in the Foreign Policy in Focus, The Globalist, Beliefnet and
the Muslim Observer.

August 14th and August 15th mark the 56th anniversary of the independence of Pakistan and India from British colonialism. In a sense it is the independence of India and the birth of Pakistan whose history begins only after decolonization. It is a sad commentary on the political condition of South Asia that even though the region has been independent for over half a century, it is still not free.

Today, both India and Pakistan are gripped in the frenzy of religious fervor that is fundamentally negative in its orientation. Religious anger, activism and mass mobilization in both nations is mobilized against some thing rather than standing for something.

India’s religious revival is taking the form of a Hindu nationalist movement that is rabidly opposed to secularism and its religious minorities. Hindutva – the Hindu nationalist movement in India – showed its true saffron in March 2002 when it used the burning of a train by Muslims rioting against molestation of women that killed 60 passengers by unleashing a state sponsored pogrom that slaughtered, murdered and burned alive over 2000 Muslims. Nearly two hundred thousand Muslims were dispossessed of their property, had their businesses and livelihood destroyed and they overnight became refuges in their own home land. Today, thanks to the Hindutva movement, the color saffron stands more for the color of Muslim blood than Hindu faith.

Compare the response of Americans to the attacks of September 11th when officials rushed to protect America’s Muslim minority with that of India’s where government officials, both politicians and bureaucrats, worked with the mobs to facilitate the massacre, and one will quickly realize that in Gujarat the stench of burning flesh was mixed with the stench of the burning of India’s secularism, pluralism, democracy and hopes for freedom.

Perhaps in terms of shock value and implications for the future, the Hindutva movement had perpetrated the worst crime against India’s soul since its independence. The events of Gujarat will come back to haunt India as it aspires for international recognition and seeks an important role in global governance. Nations which harbor desires of global leadership cannot at the same time harbor mass murderers in leadership positions.

In Pakistan, the call to apply Islam in the public sphere quickly degenerates into violence against some religious minority. Muslim extremists continue to enjoy great freedom in Pakistan. They seem to have only one purpose in life, to find a community that they can hate and target for violence. Ahmadis, Shiis, and Christians have all experienced the violent hatred of “Islamization” in Pakistan. In the last ten years, religiously motivated sectarian violence has taken thousands of lives in Pakistan and prevented the emergence of a stable state, or the establishment of a safe society. Democracy still remains only a plausibility in Pakistan.

With the growing Talibanization of Pakistan – thanks to America’s war on terror -- and the emergence of extremely odious characters such as Maulana Fazlur Rahman as a prominent political force the future of Pakistan remains deeply entangled with religious hatred and violence.  If religious parties do not immediately eschew the path of rhetoric and ideology and adopt more moderate and pragmatic programs it is but a matter of time that Pakistan itself will become a victim of terrorism by Muslim militants and most certainly the next stop in America’s war on terror.

Besides giving religion a bad name, religious zealots have only contributed to the destabilization of South Asia and heightening the prospects of a nuclear disaster. As religious extremists jockey for positions of power in India and Pakistan, their past record and the prospects of seeing their murderous hands on nuclear triggers is rapidly becoming a source for nightmares for security experts in the region and elsewhere.

Both India and Pakistan are deeply traditional and religious societies.  It is difficult to expect them to become completely secular. Somehow the two nations must find a way to accommodate the political impulses of their faith based communities without undermining the civil liberties of minorities, without disrupting political and economic development and most importantly without raising nuclear security dilemmas.

Today, religious zealots in both nations remain a domestic as well as an international threat. Both India and Pakistan, in spite of all their wars and the political and social turmoil, have progressed economically as well as technologically. Both are poised to break away from their low-income status and become middle income, industrializing and globalizing nations. Both nations have large international diasporas that can help bring in FDI, technology, and international business.



India is already well situated to become a major economic and cultural power worldwide. Indian culture through the popularity of Indian cinema is already giving India the kind of soft power that only America enjoys worldwide. India is now acknowledged as a software giant. With its huge pool of management and tech experts it alone can compete with China for the status of the next global power.

Pakistan’s credentials as a nuclear power, and its current role as the frontline state in the war on terror, has forced the world to finally accept it as an important global player. Pakistanis in Europe and America are also developing their own tech-centered capabilities that will contribute to Pakistan’s development.

It looks as if “God” alone stands between success and disaster in South Asia. The competing processes of economic and technological growth and religio-political degeneration manifest a unique example of the phenomenon as simultaneous integration and disintegration described by Benjamin Barber as Jihad versus MacWorld.  It is a tragedy that even after independence, India and Pakistan remain slaves to their own demons.

Religion should empower not enslave. Religion should enlighten and ennoble humanity not make beasts out of humans. Religion is the source of ultimate peace, it should not become the source of conflict.

Muqtedar Khan, a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution, is author of American Muslims: Bridging Faith and Freedom. His web address is

Related Articles:

Islam, Hinduism and Truth

The Tragedy of Gujarat

Kashmir may be tougher to resolve than Palestine

Kashmir: India's Gateway to Greatness

Pakistan: Paradise Lost


Muqtedar Khan is currently a Visiting Fellow at the Brookings Institution’s Saban Center for Middle East Policy. He is the author of American Muslims: Bridging Faith and Freedom.


Recent Articles on GlocalEye

July 15, 2003

First Establish the Will to Peace -
Then chart the Way to Peace

June 21, 2003

Is American Foreign Policy a Threat to American Security?

June 13, 2003

The Public Face of Christian Evangelical Bigotry

June 09, 2003

The Legacy of Prophet Muhammad and the issues of Pedophilia and Polygamy:

Nice But Tough: A Framework for US Foreign Policy in the Muslim World

May 09, 2003

NEXT STOP:  Making  Peace, 
Restoring Credibility

February 06, 2003

 A Memo to Mr. Binladen: Go to Hell!: 

February 06, 2003

If the UN vetoes the US, it risks irrelevance?

January 28, 2003

Heavy Rhetoric, Wishful Thinking and Hydrogen Cars: A Response to the State of the Union Address