Editors: This is a self syndicated
column. If you wish to publish this column in your newspaper, magazine, journal or
on your websites please click here:Syndicate
Dr.
Muqtedar Khan is Assistant Professor of Political Science at Adrian College in
Michigan. He earned his Ph.D. in International Relations, Political Philosophy, and
Islamic Political Thought, from Georgetown University in May 2000. |
Dr. Khan's column has
appeared in The Daily Telegram, San Francisco Chronicle, Detroit Free Press, Detroit
News, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, Muslim Democrat,
Iviews.com,ptimes.com, Theglobalist.com, Freerepublic.com, MiddleEast Online,
Beliefnet.com, Arabies Trends, Al-Mustaqbal, and many other periodicals world wide.
For a comprehensive resume click here: Resume |
Recently
Posted Articles |
Osama Bin
Laden is an Enemy of Islam
To War or not
to War in Ramadan
Muslims Must
Develop an Intolerance for Intolerance
Is US
Foreign Policy a Barrier to Democracy in the Muslim World?
A Memo to
Americans
A
Memo to American Muslims

JOIN GLOCALEYE
EMAIL LIST
|
|
|
|
TO WAR OR NOT TO WAR IN RAMADAN
Muqtedar
Khan
Bush administrations
decision to continue its present attacks on Afghanistan during the holy month of Ramadan
will have a significant impact on two fundamental components in the war on terrorism
propaganda and alliance building.
The administration
wishes to convey in the clearest of terms that this is a war against terrorism and not
against Islam. President Bush promised to repeat this statement every day if he had to. If President Bush continues to bomb Afghanistan
even when its citizens are turning towards God and trying to immerse in prayers and
fasting, he will only confirm the global stereotype of the US as a callous and arrogant
superpower eager. War in Ramadan will undermine US attempts to win the battle for Muslim
public opinion.
In the Muslim
world, satellite images of the US bombing Afghans who have had no food or water the entire
day, will raise tempers and animosity towards the US. The war may increase support for and
popularity of the Taliban and Bin Laden and win them many volunteers. It will be difficult
for moderate Muslims and Muslim governments to convince Muslims that the American war is
not a war against Islam. Muslims watch on Al Jazeera and other networks as Israel in
Palestine and the US in Afghanistan kill innocent Muslims in tandem. Bin Ladens
statement that this is a new crusade against Islam will have a truer ring to it.
Mosques everywhere
see a manifold increase in attendance during the month of Ramadan. Muslims try to not only increase their
spirituality but also make many resolutions to recommit themselves to live by Islamic
values in Ramadan. The religious fervor is very strong and Muslims by and large are able
to sustain this high level of spiritual and ritual activity for the entire month of
Ramadan.
Imams in most
mosques in Pakistan and the Arab world are not overly eager to cooperate with America. The Imams will strike back from the pulpits and
will whip up an anti-American wave and they will have the undivided attention of more than
usual number of Muslims in Ramadan. American
bombs on Afghanistan and the rhetoric from the pulpits will combine to convince millions
of Muslims that this is indeed a war on Islam. The
pressure will build and Muslim regimes will be forced to deal with it, either by resorting
to repression at home or by actively distancing themselves and even opposing the US
campaign in Afghanistan.
If the Bush
administration loses the propaganda war and further alienates the Muslim population, it
will be the end of the so-called global alliance against terror.
Vulnerable Muslim
nations such as Pakistan, Egypt and Saudi Arabia will be most affected by the growing
anger in the Muslim World. Pakistan has
risked internal stability by supporting and assisting US attacks on the Taliban and
Al-Qaeda. There is a limit to how much
pressure Musharraf can handle. He has repeatedly called for a short and targeted
attack, basically opposing sustained and indiscriminate bombings. It is time that
Washington began paying attention to his vulnerabilities that essentially signify the
vulnerabilities of most Muslim regimes.
Many Muslim leaders
such as Musharraf of Pakistan and Al Kharazi, the foreign minister of Iran, and senior
ministers of Saudi Arabia and Egypt have all warned the US to end its bombing campaign
before Ramadan. Their message is clear. I hope Washington is decoding their statements
correctly.
What leaders of the
Muslim countries are really doing is setting a deadline for ending the military campaign
against Afghanistan. For many it has achieved very little, excepting hurting Afghan
civilians and eroding the sympathy that Muslims had for the US after Sept. 11th. Americans must realize that if the casualties of
innocent Afghans reach six thousand then at least in the eyes of Muslims, Bush will be
just as evil as Bin Laden and the claim by militants that the US is a terrorist state will
resonate. Muslim nations now working with the US will bail out of the coalition before
that happens.
Does that mean the
US should give up its war on terrorism? Certainly not.
What it means is that the US becomes more sensitive to the public opinion in
the Muslim world and values the lives of innocent Muslims as much as it values the lives
of innocent Americans.
The best way to
negotiate the month of Ramadan is to cease air attacks, let the Afghan population have
some reprieve. It should shift its emphasis to use of more special ops, covert ground
operations, and more targeted and less visible attacks on Bin Ladens human and
material assets.
Prayers and
abstinence can do more good than bombs and missiles.
Bush would do well to dedicate this month of Ramadan to a global
appreciation of Islam and invite all peace loving people of the world to join Muslims in
spiritual development, prayer and contemplation. This is eminently necessary after the
blow that humanity took on Sept. 11th.
This article was published in Newsday,
Mirror International and Muslim Observer. |
 |